LibraryCrunch Visual Archive

Post 9 of 414 · 2005-09-22

← Back to full archive

Is New York Times Select Failing?

Originally published 2005-09-22

Screenshot of the original LibraryCrunch post: Is New York Times Select Failing?
Open screenshot Download searchable PDF Read transcript Download transcript Wayback capture
Text transcript from the PDF text layer
It's only been four days now since the New York Times began charging for access to its Op-Ed writers, but I've already noticed a trend developing. Looking at the Most Emailed Articles you will now see very few, if any, Op-Ed writers listed, whereas the Op-Eds used to lead this list, with Dowd, Rich and Friedman being the top most emailed writers. For a while this morning Dowd's latest column was highly emailed, but at 1PM there are no Op-Eds listed. What does this mean? Perhaps nothing, but if the trend continues and the Times cannot get enough subscribers they'll have to reconsider this strategy -- these are huge names and if the readership levels decrease too much it will dilute the power that these writers command, not to mention the strength of the Times Op-Ed page itself.
← Older: Anonymous BloggingNewer: Web 2.0 MEME Map and a good link →
Captured from http://www.librarycrunch.com:80/2005/09/new_york_times_select_1.html via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine. The screenshot and PDF preserve the captured visual layout; the transcript is provided for search and accessibility.